You’ve worked hard to build significant W2 compensation. The last thing you want is to implement a strategy that creates unnecessary audit risk, penalties, or future problems.
An audit passing does not mean the strategy is legally solid. Examiners can miss issues or lack deep expertise. Real tax risk is whether the position holds up under serious professional scrutiny.
Many strategies look attractive on the surface but carry hidden risks — especially for California W2 households earning $1M+. What passes a casual review can fall apart under deeper examination.
We cut through the noise and assess every strategy against six key dimensions of real tax risk.
The foundation. A strategy must have clear support in the Internal Revenue Code, Treasury regulations, and court decisions. Without all three, it is speculative. Serra only includes strategies that meet this standard.
Some approaches have been tested repeatedly in court and survived. Others have little precedent. This history helps you understand the real exposure you are taking on.
Many good ideas fail in practice because of missing paperwork, incorrect elections, or sloppy recordkeeping. How well it is executed often matters more than the idea itself.
California does not always follow federal rules. A strategy that looks safe federally can carry much higher state risk.
Some positions require special IRS forms. Missing them does not kill the strategy, but it raises the chance of closer review.
If the position is challenged, you need to understand the possible adjustments and costs. Knowing the realistic range helps you decide whether the strategy fits your overall plan.
We run every strategy through these six filters before it appears on the site. The fit scores and details you see on the Strategies page come directly from this review. Our goal is to give you clear, honest information so you can make informed decisions with confidence and peace of mind.
Discover which strategies align with your compensation mix and risk tolerance.
Take the assessment →